ugly ugly stuff, but it definitely needs to be aired and acknowledged. Thank you the research you've done to put all this together. There are predators everywhere, but it's especially disturbing to find one preying on the vulnerable, using their hope and trust for personal gain and in the process very likely harming or killing them. Makis is the lowest of the low. I wish he could be arrested, tried and sent to prison for what he's done.
the thing is, they don't. They work for some but it's a small minority. And he's not honest about his success rate. Is it 15 percent, 25 percent, 35 percent? He won't say, he won't publish his results. So I see him as a charlatan, a snake oil salesman. Some people benefit, but most do not. And the sad thing is that most of those who don't benefit could have benefitted by other therapies, maybe in conjunction with what he's doing. And this all goes back to the complete failure of Western medicine and its insistence on pushing expensive drugs that has made the alternative medicine arena more attractive. But that arena is a Wild West show. And people like Makis take advantage of that.
Thing is, they do work; and I say this because many other respected doctors are using his same therapies. Absolutely agree though, his current way of sending out anonymised results is absolutely unverifiable and I can’t help wondering if many of those are made up. We need someone independent to keep full records so we can verify with confidence how many are helped. Perhaps worth remembering that conventional cancer therapies are not particularly effective.
I subscribed to his substack! I thought he was doing great work until I found out about his darker side, his anger and rage, his lashing out at anyone who even asks questions about what he's doing, his refusal to tell the truth about his success rate. As I said, sometimes his protocol works, but not the majority of the time. He won't come clean about his success rate, and believe me if he was having success even 50 percent of the time, he'd be shouting that from the rooftops! So the fact that he is not publishing results implies that his success rate basically sucks. And it's not "his" protocol anyway, other doctors are using similar protocols, many are trying Fenben and IVM along with other therapies. We need accurate reporting on what works. But this guy is not helpful in that regard.
I’m curious. I had a subscription to Makis on Substack so I could track his unraveling, as you so aptly described it. Today I got a subscription refund & now I can’t find his Substack. Did he block me or shut his page down? BTW, still no verified Florida medical license after claiming his application was approved over 70 days ago.
I also got a refund from Makis today because he blocked me. You get a refund when you have a paid subscription to someone who blocks you (even though I only subscribed to his blog temporarily so I could find incriminating information on him or I could redpill his followers on him, so maybe it made strategic sense for him to block the spies).
Holy Shit! Im a reader of most of the folks mentioned here. What a clown car. First, we educate ourselves to pull away from the medical mafia...now we have to be behavioral psychologists to filter out the remaining group :)
Ah, I see, someone who doesn't need to read or hear the facts to judge. That must be a chance.
But that could have contributed to help you understand the context here, being that you're defending a sexual harasser and a pathological liar, against someone very hard to suspect to be a Rockefeller spoke-person.
And that I offered a chance to Makis to comment 24 hours before to publish.
First, Makis didn't bring ivermectin to the forefront. That work was done by researchers like Satoshi Omura, the FLCCC physicians, and scientists who ran actual trials. Makis adopted the topic after his pivot from actively promoting boosters in late 2021, which we documented in the second thread. He is a beneficiary of their work, not its architect. And most of his activity consists in spreading undocumented anecdotes of miraculous recoveries.
Second, and this is the core of your question: you're right that we don't hear from those for whom it hasn't worked, and it's not by accident but rather by Makis's (not very) cautious curation. Makis controls what his audience sees. Patients whose outcomes don't fit the narrative get quietly dropped; those who ask hard questions - for bloodwork, imaging, any verifiable evidence - get blocked. Numerous witnesses have stepped forward to report the pattern of suppressing unfavorable outcomes and abandoning patients - which is the opposite of what legitimate research requires.
Third - and this matters for anyone who genuinely supports repurposed drugs in oncology - a man with findings of sexual harassment, a cancelled medical licence, and a vexatious-litigant designation who presents himself as a movement's figurehead is actively harmful to that movement's credibility ; and to the treatments he promotes, regardless of their effectiveness.
Every journalist, regulator, or oncologist who looks into repurposed cancer protocols and finds Makis at the center has all the reason they need to dismiss the entire field. The researchers doing the real work - and subjecting their results to scrutiny - are the ones who suffer when Makis makes himself the face of something he did not build, and yet from which he largely benefits.
Repurposed drugs deserve serious investigation. That investigation requires transparency about failures, verifiable patient data, and practitioners whose records can withstand scrutiny. Makis offers none of these. The target of these articles is to warn people exploring these options for themselves, or their families, that they would be wise to seek guidance from practitioners who welcome questions rather than block them.
He was a staunch leader in the fight against lockdowns and vaccines. From day one. This article keeps having to get posted cause he must be destroyed. Albertas knew when he pointed out the convicted child pedo drs were allowed back in He did do much for so many. Unless he treated YOU and you were not saved (dead now) thus is all a shit fest.
I love your work and I value it very highly. I am extremely disappointed that you restacked this hit piece on Dr. Makis. I am a fellow Albertan and I am very familiar with Dr. Makis’ character, his work, and all he has done to fight the evil doers and heal cancer victims. We need to support one another in this fight, not attack one another. Please re-think this post. Look into the details. I hope you will post a retraction that clears Dr. Makis’ name, his character, and his work.
“Dr. William Makis admitted to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA) that he engaged in zoophilia and told a nurse he had "masturbated his cat." This admission was part of a 2015 investigation into his professional conduct, where he acknowledged sending explicit, sexually inappropriate images to staff members.
The allegations were documented in a formal complaint filed by nurse Sarah Rayner in December 2015, which included five pages of evidence regarding the explicit photographs Makis sent her.”
If you don't have anything better to do than write hit pieces against doctors fighting for medical freedom and healing then I doubt your integrity. I have much better things to do than bother to read such unhelpful trash that seeks to divide and conquer.
Everyone you mentioned. All of Makis "persecuters."
The only thing I know about you is that you did a great job documenting that sociopathic fraudster's long history of fuckery a couple of weeks back. And these day by day beef descriptions are great too.
But you seem to think at least some of the characters mentioned above are legitimate/sane. What's up with that?
I do excellent work, yes, you can check the rest of this blog, I've documented at length numerous bad actors, and some interesting pharma frauds.
Let's be more specific then, now that I know you're not talking about me. Can you provide evidence that Jikkyleaks is a grifter ? I would be mind-blown.
That was my impression from reading through this piece quickly. That you held some positive regard for some of Makis recent "attackers;" - maybe Rose, piece of shit Andrew Zywiec, Henry Ealy, Amy Kelly. However "reasoned" and "sceptical" they may have been 6byesrs ago, they're all malignant, grifting fuckers now
But I may be wrong, about your regard for some of the characters in this WWE-lije saga. I'll try to read through your stuff more carefully this afternoon.
How come you haven't noticed . I mean. You do a great job of describing all their lunatic bullshit. Thanks. Sorry I missed it. I've been on the Demonic spells bullshit investigating with Candace. And the Predator class wars. I only check with Dr Mary Talley Bowdens ivory tower virtue signalling bullshit these days.
Add that to everyone going on about retards zombies demons and no justice.
Seems that some days you see stuff like this, .... and the Depopulation Crew comes to mind and the only thing that you can think of is, "You know what??" lol
ugly ugly stuff, but it definitely needs to be aired and acknowledged. Thank you the research you've done to put all this together. There are predators everywhere, but it's especially disturbing to find one preying on the vulnerable, using their hope and trust for personal gain and in the process very likely harming or killing them. Makis is the lowest of the low. I wish he could be arrested, tried and sent to prison for what he's done.
That’s the thing - he’s unstable, but looks like his treatments work. Lots of others doing the same.
the thing is, they don't. They work for some but it's a small minority. And he's not honest about his success rate. Is it 15 percent, 25 percent, 35 percent? He won't say, he won't publish his results. So I see him as a charlatan, a snake oil salesman. Some people benefit, but most do not. And the sad thing is that most of those who don't benefit could have benefitted by other therapies, maybe in conjunction with what he's doing. And this all goes back to the complete failure of Western medicine and its insistence on pushing expensive drugs that has made the alternative medicine arena more attractive. But that arena is a Wild West show. And people like Makis take advantage of that.
Thing is, they do work; and I say this because many other respected doctors are using his same therapies. Absolutely agree though, his current way of sending out anonymised results is absolutely unverifiable and I can’t help wondering if many of those are made up. We need someone independent to keep full records so we can verify with confidence how many are helped. Perhaps worth remembering that conventional cancer therapies are not particularly effective.
He’s cancer clinic was taken from Alberta by Trudeau and moved to Vancouver. You tell only the parts you want people to know. You must work for cbc
I subscribed to his substack! I thought he was doing great work until I found out about his darker side, his anger and rage, his lashing out at anyone who even asks questions about what he's doing, his refusal to tell the truth about his success rate. As I said, sometimes his protocol works, but not the majority of the time. He won't come clean about his success rate, and believe me if he was having success even 50 percent of the time, he'd be shouting that from the rooftops! So the fact that he is not publishing results implies that his success rate basically sucks. And it's not "his" protocol anyway, other doctors are using similar protocols, many are trying Fenben and IVM along with other therapies. We need accurate reporting on what works. But this guy is not helpful in that regard.
I found nothing like that and conversed with him regularly
His cancer clinic wasn't taken by Trudeau, as was covered at length in the previous article: https://blog.openvaet.info/p/william-makis-the-truth-behind-a
That's lies for feeble-minded.
Why don't you ask Makis the proof that, as he claimed by writing, "Sarah Rayner recanted her testimony", and come back to us when he has blocked you ?
You're blind
And we both know you haven't read said article otherwise your comment would be on point, and able to quote one insufficiently sourced element ?
Makis pushed the vax in half his threads up to end 2021 by the way, and deleted the inconvenient half later.
I’m curious. I had a subscription to Makis on Substack so I could track his unraveling, as you so aptly described it. Today I got a subscription refund & now I can’t find his Substack. Did he block me or shut his page down? BTW, still no verified Florida medical license after claiming his application was approved over 70 days ago.
I also got a refund from Makis today because he blocked me. You get a refund when you have a paid subscription to someone who blocks you (even though I only subscribed to his blog temporarily so I could find incriminating information on him or I could redpill his followers on him, so maybe it made strategic sense for him to block the spies).
Ok. That’s what I thought. Thank you so much for the reply.
Interesting note regarding license.
Holy Shit! Im a reader of most of the folks mentioned here. What a clown car. First, we educate ourselves to pull away from the medical mafia...now we have to be behavioral psychologists to filter out the remaining group :)
another rockerfels schmear campaign. Because he is helping people cure cancer. So let’s just cancel him?!
Get a life grifter.
You haven't spent very long trying to read the articles or investigating my Substack before to comment, have you?
We don't have time to read your Rockefeller trash.
https://substack.com/@makisw
I don’t need to read it. I have Seen this M.O. many times before
I would like to see you invite maki’s for an open discussion. Instead of what you are doing here.
Ah, I see, someone who doesn't need to read or hear the facts to judge. That must be a chance.
But that could have contributed to help you understand the context here, being that you're defending a sexual harasser and a pathological liar, against someone very hard to suspect to be a Rockefeller spoke-person.
And that I offered a chance to Makis to comment 24 hours before to publish.
I know how about using your powers for good instead of evil
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CkTct52gm/?mibextid=wwXIfr
Interesting article
What does this make his bringing ivermectin et al to the forefront?
Others are using his protocols with some success, I say some as we don’t hear from those who it hasn’t worked for.
Others are researching why his repurposed meds work and figuring out why.
So do his personality issues affect the repurposed meds movement?
First, Makis didn't bring ivermectin to the forefront. That work was done by researchers like Satoshi Omura, the FLCCC physicians, and scientists who ran actual trials. Makis adopted the topic after his pivot from actively promoting boosters in late 2021, which we documented in the second thread. He is a beneficiary of their work, not its architect. And most of his activity consists in spreading undocumented anecdotes of miraculous recoveries.
Second, and this is the core of your question: you're right that we don't hear from those for whom it hasn't worked, and it's not by accident but rather by Makis's (not very) cautious curation. Makis controls what his audience sees. Patients whose outcomes don't fit the narrative get quietly dropped; those who ask hard questions - for bloodwork, imaging, any verifiable evidence - get blocked. Numerous witnesses have stepped forward to report the pattern of suppressing unfavorable outcomes and abandoning patients - which is the opposite of what legitimate research requires.
Third - and this matters for anyone who genuinely supports repurposed drugs in oncology - a man with findings of sexual harassment, a cancelled medical licence, and a vexatious-litigant designation who presents himself as a movement's figurehead is actively harmful to that movement's credibility ; and to the treatments he promotes, regardless of their effectiveness.
Every journalist, regulator, or oncologist who looks into repurposed cancer protocols and finds Makis at the center has all the reason they need to dismiss the entire field. The researchers doing the real work - and subjecting their results to scrutiny - are the ones who suffer when Makis makes himself the face of something he did not build, and yet from which he largely benefits.
Repurposed drugs deserve serious investigation. That investigation requires transparency about failures, verifiable patient data, and practitioners whose records can withstand scrutiny. Makis offers none of these. The target of these articles is to warn people exploring these options for themselves, or their families, that they would be wise to seek guidance from practitioners who welcome questions rather than block them.
He was a staunch leader in the fight against lockdowns and vaccines. From day one. This article keeps having to get posted cause he must be destroyed. Albertas knew when he pointed out the convicted child pedo drs were allowed back in He did do much for so many. Unless he treated YOU and you were not saved (dead now) thus is all a shit fest.
Dr. Doc Malik,
I love your work and I value it very highly. I am extremely disappointed that you restacked this hit piece on Dr. Makis. I am a fellow Albertan and I am very familiar with Dr. Makis’ character, his work, and all he has done to fight the evil doers and heal cancer victims. We need to support one another in this fight, not attack one another. Please re-think this post. Look into the details. I hope you will post a retraction that clears Dr. Makis’ name, his character, and his work.
Which part of the article isn't sufficiently sourced to your taste, please?
🥱
Imagine my surprise, reading such fair comment, to discover that your account was just created, and that all your activity has been on this post.
Just awesome article!
Thank you for appreciating it !
OMG what a load of dirty washing exposed it’s quite revolting
Big Pharmaceuticals radicals must be behind of this slaughter
Viliam Makis is behind this slaughter. Do you suspect him to be a Big pharma radical, and why?
That's exactly what I think.
Had to look up what “zoophilia”means. OMG.
“Dr. William Makis admitted to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA) that he engaged in zoophilia and told a nurse he had "masturbated his cat." This admission was part of a 2015 investigation into his professional conduct, where he acknowledged sending explicit, sexually inappropriate images to staff members.
The allegations were documented in a formal complaint filed by nurse Sarah Rayner in December 2015, which included five pages of evidence regarding the explicit photographs Makis sent her.”
Truth will come out. The God of Abraham assures it. Blah blah blah.
If you don't have anything better to do than write hit pieces against doctors fighting for medical freedom and healing then I doubt your integrity. I have much better things to do than bother to read such unhelpful trash that seeks to divide and conquer.
Shitty grifters beefing with other shitty grifters.
Can you develop how I'm grifting with the paid subscriptions disabled, and having even disabled the possibility to "pledge later support" ?
Everyone you mentioned. All of Makis "persecuters."
The only thing I know about you is that you did a great job documenting that sociopathic fraudster's long history of fuckery a couple of weeks back. And these day by day beef descriptions are great too.
But you seem to think at least some of the characters mentioned above are legitimate/sane. What's up with that?
I do excellent work, yes, you can check the rest of this blog, I've documented at length numerous bad actors, and some interesting pharma frauds.
Let's be more specific then, now that I know you're not talking about me. Can you provide evidence that Jikkyleaks is a grifter ? I would be mind-blown.
That was my impression from reading through this piece quickly. That you held some positive regard for some of Makis recent "attackers;" - maybe Rose, piece of shit Andrew Zywiec, Henry Ealy, Amy Kelly. However "reasoned" and "sceptical" they may have been 6byesrs ago, they're all malignant, grifting fuckers now
But I may be wrong, about your regard for some of the characters in this WWE-lije saga. I'll try to read through your stuff more carefully this afternoon.
"Ike" Yeadon??? Mike this isn't you being a snake again is it?
She asked you why you think any of them are sane.
When they aren't
How come you haven't noticed . I mean. You do a great job of describing all their lunatic bullshit. Thanks. Sorry I missed it. I've been on the Demonic spells bullshit investigating with Candace. And the Predator class wars. I only check with Dr Mary Talley Bowdens ivory tower virtue signalling bullshit these days.
Add that to everyone going on about retards zombies demons and no justice.
2+2= 4!!
They are all so obviously insane!
Seems that some days you see stuff like this, .... and the Depopulation Crew comes to mind and the only thing that you can think of is, "You know what??" lol
🥱
You will never keep a good doctor down. No matter how much you try.
Considering he is neither good nor a doctor we have no worries!